1. Looking Towards the Post Green Era - by Doug Moheny

    Looking Towards the Post Green Era - by Doug Moheny

    This week I've seen announcements for everything from a "green" tape server solution to Big Iron mainframes. If nearly everyone is green, then the concept of green has been diluted and is just another item on the checklist. To borrow a line from BB King, "The thrill is gone."

    Stakeholders in the Green Data Center world need to rapidly evolve and clarify their messaging, otherwise they are going to get lost in the ever-growing pile of green snow being shoveled out by the PR and marketing wonks.  You know how this conversation goes.  C-level executive: "Have we used green this month?"  Lower-level flunky: "Yes, we've incorporated it into 25 percent of our press releases, have a dedicated web page up touting our green-creds, and you'll find green sprinkled into your speech at the Chamber of Commerce next week."

    Practices in the Post-Green Era will revolve around the themes of rightsizing, sustainability, and carbon-footprint.  Too many companies are happy about bragging about how they are building more green data centers rather than consolidating operations through virtualization and eliminating excessive data storage, outsourcing when they can, and building from scratch only as a last and final resort.   

    To me, sustainability is an on-going process, doing as much as you can with the data center you have to make it more energy efficient and eco-friendly.  Sooner or later, a data center is going to reach a relative plateau as to energy efficient it can become, so that will mean looking at the corporate value cost-benefit trades for moving to a smaller carbon footprint, such as solar, wind, and geothermal; while not perfect, Bloom's energy server can also play a role.

    Rightsizing will come to fruition in short order because it's a cost-driven principle; already federal and state governments are on the bandwagon to get most optimized usage of existing resources because there's a realization that they have overbuilt capacity floating around and just burning kilowatts.

    Sustainability will be a tougher battle.  Companies will easily opt to choose a sustainable path if it breaks even or saves money, but few will go that route if it costs a lot more. 

    The toughest battle revolves around carbon footprint.  Some companies are electing to purchase clean or cleaner energy, but in most cases, they are paying a premium unless there are other sweeteners involved.  Outsourcing operations to a carbon-clean data center makes sense if there are cost savings tied in.  Similarly, Bloom Energy has found attractors because in certain circumstances it can save money and lower carbon footprint.

    Recent Comments

    Reply Permalink
    On 7/30/10 Carbon1 said:
    I couldn't agree more with your views around 'green wash' and the negative impact this is having - although its not all doom and gloom ! Here at the Carbon Trust in the UK we have been looking at Data Centre optimisation for some time and have recently launched a new service which covers all aspects of the data centre life cycle from design and build ( location, passive design, building fabric, on-site renewable energy generation - waste heat re-use etc) through to best practice operation which covers aspects such as consolidation, rationalisation and virtualisation, modular design and operation etc. Our approach is holistic in that we consider both the IT 'layer' and supporting mechanical and electrical 'layer' bringing together for the first time a full range a specialist skill sets in one intervention. The approach also references the EU Code of Conduct for data centres as a good benchmark for data centre optimisation. Due to the fact we are an independent and well respected brand in the carbon space we can cut through the greenwash and provide objective business cases for optimising new and existing facilities. This often involves more sophisticated approaches to calculating the cost of carbon to a business and indeed the future costs not just in terms of overhead but to future business continuity and market share.

    We also recognise, validate and certificate empirical based evidence of carbon reduction through the Carbon Trust Standard - indeed Telecity a large co-location data centre provider here in the UK recently attained the Carbon Trust Standard - not so amazing you may think - but actually this is quite an achievement given they are in a growth market and a very high proportion of their carbon footprint is electricty consumption to deliver their platforms - hence any reduction has to be in their core area of business rather than at the periphery. Telecity actually sets a clear precedent in the co-location market as it is the first to achieve the Carbon Trust Standard – most significantly it also demonstrates that the supposed ‘disconnect’ with the customer in terms of how they configure and operate their IT infrastructure on a co-lo’s platform can actually be overcome in relation to carbon reduction - in this case it appears this was as simple as engaging their customers and getting agreement to make simple changes to the facility like blanking plates and operating temperature threshold.

    I also agree about carbon footprint as the future challenge or what we would term as full life cycle carbon assessment - this is a topic we are addressing through our ICT Forum with industry and our Carbon Footprinting Company - our aspiration is to provide the ICT industry with the ‘golden key’ to unlocking the 'enabling' impact of ICT in terms of displacing more carbon intensive legacy or manual based systems and processes – in essence the key is a much simplified framework and methodology to enable full LCA carbon footprinting of products and services and hence transparencies in relation to the net carbon benefit of any given digital solution. This being said, our position is that industry should remain focused at optimising their existing infrastructure and re-designing their technology roadmaps for future build out. Failure to do this will only compound the problem of emissions from ICT as we see exponential growth of data volumes and mass adoption of existing digital technologies in emerging non OECD markets. Most importantly it will detract from the value of realising a low carbon future through a digital approach. The biggest challenge we have beyond LCA measurement is how we then go on to reduce emissions from ICT at a macro level – my opinion is we should go back to first principles in relation to design and start thinking about truly dynamic, load - linear devices, networks and hence ICT infrastructure in general i.e. its on or its off !




    Reply Permalink
    On 8/4/10 huxuecan said:
    efit of any given digital solution. This being said, our position is that industry should remain focused at optimising their existing infrastructure and re-designing their technology roadmaps for future build out. Failure to do this will only compound the problem of emissions from ICT as we see exponential growth of data volumes and mass adoption of existing digital technologies in emerging non OECD markets. Most importantly it will detract from the value of realising a low carbon future through a digital approach. The biggest challenge we have
    Reply Permalink
    On 8/18/10 Carbon1 said:
    Thanks for your 'edit' - any other comments welcome

    Login to comment.

  1. Categories

    1. Data Center Design:

      Construction, Container, Data Center Outages, Monitoring, Power and Cooling
    2. Policy:

      Cap and Trade, Carbon Footprint, Carbon Reduction Commitment, Carbon Tax, Emissions
    3. Power:

      Biomass, Fossil Fuel, Fuel Cell, Geothermal, Hydro, Nuclear, Solar, Wind
    4. Application:

      Cloud Computing, Grid Computing
    5. Technology:

      Microblogging, Networking, Servers, Storage, Supercomputer
  2. Topics Mentioned