1. A new energy currency- by tate cantrell

    Views and Opinions on Green IT (Oct 20 2009) Carbon Tax , Emissions

    1. A new energy currency- by tate cantrell

      In last week’s blog, I mentioned the potential impact of a Copenhagen Protocol coming out of the upcoming December summit on companies’ long-term carbon emissions planning.  One of the questions I received back on that post asked what might happen if the Copenhagen Protocol doesn’t pass.  What impact would something like that have on the energy supply?  Does energy become a new, high-value currency?  If so, what options do companies, and countries for that matter, have open to them?

      The UK is facing this very real threat in the next few years, independent of the Copenhagen Protocol.  Recently, the TimesOnline reported that Britain’s energy regulator is forecasting a power supply reduction in the UK in the next four years.  The country is scrambling to renovate its power infrastructure ahead of a new EU pollution rule resulting in the potential closure of a quarter of UK power stations by 2015.  Until new power stations are up and running, the UK is at great risk for not having enough energy to meet customer demand for a four to five year time period.  As a result, Britain will be more vulnerable to energy supply shocks than any other major country in Europe.

      So what can companies do now to minimize the impact of either one of these scenarios? One option is to look at off-shore locations for their most power-hungry IT infrastructure needs, i.e. data centers.  I discussed this strategy a few months back in my posting about Emergency Power Strategies, and utilizing a remote location for a company’s data center can mitigate the risks involved in the energy supply chain.  When you look at an off-shore location like Iceland, you not only minimize the exposure to local energy supply and potential pricing issues, but a company can also reap additional benefits like stable energy pricing and renewable energy sources.  It almost seems too good to be true – reduce risk, go green and save money. 

      With these very serious energy issues facing CIOs today, companies are going to have to re-evaluate their power supply strategies, and looking to someplace like Iceland might just be the answer.


      Bookmark or Share this article

    Recent Comments


    Reply Permalink
    On 10/22/09 JuliusJ said:
    "There is a definitive need to create extra funds, or to cut spending, and one of the ways people save is to cut insurance cost spending. Granted, it's a gamble to cut insurance cost spending, but frankly flood insurance in Arizona isn't a great idea. Tornado insurance in the Pacific Northwest might be a waste as well. (Although there are extremely rare, but documented, instances of tornados in the Evergreen State.) It is a gamble, though, because everyone does need insurance coverage of some sort. Whether it's insuring your house, car, or your health, to <a rev="vote for" title="Is Cutting Back on Insurance A Good Way to Find Debt Relief?" href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/10/14/cut-insurance-cost-debt-relief/ ">cut insurance cost</a> and/or coverage is a risky thing to do, whether it's done with debt relief in mind or not."

    Login to comment.